Suit against ex-judge Seidlin grows
Attorneys, accountant, included
Robert Nolin
November 20, 2009
Sun Sentinel
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/broward/fl-seidlin-lawsuit-20091120,0,3498858.story
An elderly woman’s lawsuit against ex-judge Larry Seidlin has expanded to include three attorneys and an accountant.
Barbara Kasler, 83, whose lawyer said is worth $5 million, is suing Seidlin, who gained national notoriety for his emotional handling of the Anna Nicole Smith death case.
Kasler’s new attorney, William Scherer, filed an amended suit this week accusing Seidlin of siphoning money from Kasler and attempting to hijack her estate upon her death.
According to the suit, originally filed in Broward Circuit Court in June, Seidlin; his wife Belinda; her parents, Barbara and Oren Ray; along with Dorothy Colletto, the ex-girlfriend of Kasler’s deceased son, fleeced Kasler out of hundreds of thousands of dollars in checks, credit card purchases and the sale of property she owned.
Seidlin feigned friendship with Kasler, who lived in the same Fort Lauderdale condo as the judge and his family, the suit said, and the exploitation occurred while the now-retired Seidlin was still on the bench.
“It is absolutely horrible, horrible conduct by a sitting circuit judge,” Scherer said.
Also named in the new suit is accountant Stephen Fuller, and attorneys Robert Judd, Bruce Lehr and Raymond Posgay. All but Lehr, whose practice is in Miami, are from Fort Lauderdale.
The suit said the accountant and attorneys assisted Seidlin in his attempts to buy Kasler’s property at a discount and change her will to benefit himself and his family.
Judd declined comment; Fuller and Posgay could not be reached. “Totally frivolous and without merit,” was how Lehr characterized the suit.
Estate of Denial® provides news, analysis and commentary on abusive practices occurring in probate courts and via probate instruments (wills, trusts, guardianships, powers of attorney). We provide original perspective to educate the public regarding this growing threat to both individual freedoms and property rights.
